![]() |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
Physical Tuning | Skills & Drills | Thought Design | Team Work Training with Power Benefits | Drawbacks | Summary For the price of an entry level bike ($700), to the price of an entry level racing bike ($1500), you can be faster and stronger, all without spending more time on your bike. There is a catch. It's not made of carbon fiber or titanium, and it will add a bit of weight to your bike. Of course, you've read about it before. A couple of months ago, VeloNews ran a training article about it. Greg Lemond used it years ago. Most of the pros now use it. More of your competitors are using it. You better start thinking about getting it. Seriously. I'm talking about power meters. Not only do they measure and record your wattage, but they produce very useful reports that you can analyze on your computer, or download to your coach. They also have most (if not more) functions of a cyclometer and heart rate monitors. They've been around for some time now, and several years ago, they began appearing in mail order shop catalogs, and the occasional bike shop. The problem was that they were expensive, and few knew how to use or train effectively with them. Those excuses are mainly gone now. Graber produces the PowerTap hub that retails for about $800 for a built wheel and SRM has a model of cranks that you can get for about $1500. Polar has one that interfaces with one of their heart rate monitors for about an additional $300. Now I know what you're thinking. Yes, you can get wheels which will help you climb faster, and those gee whiz handlebars sure would be comfortable. But wouldn't it be better to be faster, stronger, and leap large buildings? Isn't it time to train more efficiently, rather than hope that the routine "you really stuck to..." works this season? The benefits of power based training are many: It eliminates guesswork from gauging exercise intensity. Even those with exceptional "feel" are unlikely to judge their wattage any better than to within perhaps 10%, whereas a power meter is accurate to ±2% or less. Trying to use a Rate of Perceived (RPE) exertion scale is notoriously inaccurate. While many advocate tossing the HRM, I believe it has value while training or racing with a power meter.back to top Of course, there are drawbacks; It appeals to the more analytical and technically oriented. Not everyone is inclined, whether by background or temperament, to take a quantitative approach to training; furthermore, feedback during a ride or race may only serve as an unwelcome distraction, rather than provide valued information. Heck, I train athletes who still don't use a heart rate monitor!back to top The mysteries of training with power are starting to be explained. Any coach worth his or her salt knows how to develop a plan for using one, and analyze the data. Hopefully, your coach uses one. Charles Howe, who provided information for this article, has an excellent manual you can reference (contact me and I'll send it to you). Beginning users will have huge amounts of questions, but go out and ride. Watch the data flow in as you ride across varied terrain and varied intensity. Then send me e-mail, and ask me some questions. If you are an athlete working with JDS Sportcoaching, you can get a PowerTap at close to wholesale cost. Because of my bionic heart, heart rate training is pretty much out of the question. I had an excuse to buy a power meter that I had secretly desired for some time. I knew the theories and I'd done the readings; it was time to measure my power output and train by it. Now it's your turn or your competition's. back to topJonathan Siegel, Director of Coaching Jonathan Siegel, CSCS, is an RRCA-certified running coach and certified cycling coach. If you have training questions or comments or are interested in a lactate test, contact JDS Sportcoaching,LLC.
Newsletter Archive | Training Blog ©
Copyright JDS Sportcoaching, LLC 2006. Reproduction only with expressed
written consent. |
||||||||||||||||